Saturday, September 29, 2007
Inside: This week in TV
However, we're pleased as punch about the new seasons of My Name is Earl and The Office (Thursdays on NBC). Both shows have somewhat narrow premises, unlike the plots of their "Must See TV" forebearers Seinfeld and Friends, which could include almost anything as long as the same characters showed up in each episode. In MNIE, the titular Earl has a list of people he has wronged; in each episode, he pursues a different person on the list in order to right the wrong. In The Office, each episode is a mockumentary; the film crew's presence is both a vital part of each episode (employees provide video "confessionals" in each episode) yet somehow invisible.
Reliance on these plot devices could have resulted in both shows stagnating after a single season. Neither has. Both season premieres (the third for MNIE and fourth for The Office) included enough changes to make them feel fresh (Earl is in jail! Pam and Jim are hooking up!), yet continue to employ all the elements that make them funny in the first place. (One example: The Office's always creepy and sporadically-used Creed matter-of-factly explaning that he's been in several cults, both as a leader and a follower, "You have more fun as a follower. But you make more money as a leader").
In other TV news, the Rock of Love season finale is tomorrow -- squee! (Okay, I know it's bad, like really, inexcusably, uber-bad, but at least we're not the only ones who are enjoying this "ridiculous but highly addictive" guilty pleasure.)
Out: September Snow
Wednesday, September 26, 2007
Out: Superer Dog
Monday, September 24, 2007
Out: Superdog!
Eventually, we figured out that he had a muscle cramp in his right hind leg (not a difficult diagnosis, since it felt approximately like a chunk of granite). We massaged it, rubbed in some muscle cream and put a heating pad on it for a couple of hours, with a few small walks in between so it wouldn’t tighten up again. By bedtime, he was still crying with each step, but the intensity had gone down a few notches.
Tuesday, September 18, 2007
Inside: WEEDS and CALIFORNICATION
Dislike: The initial problems still exist: David Duchovney's Hank still has a Peter Pan complex. And he gets way too much play for a guy like Hank. Maybe it's his cologne? Possibly, but between his unkempt appearance and constant over-drinking, he seems more like someone who smells like he's sweating out yesterday's whiskey.
And I have two new dislikes: First, Californication has The. Lamest. Intro. Ever. At least in premium-TV channel land, where intros are generally little works of art. And second, what the hell is up with Karen (Hank's ex/baby mama)? She's seemingly more together than Hank, but yet she can't help grinning like a schoolgirl whenever he's around. Maybe she still carries a torch for Hank -- I can go with that. Maybe she's not as in love with her fiance as she would like to be -- fine. But frankly, I'd think that being significant others with a guy for a decade, having a child with him, and then having a painful break up would officially get someone over the blushing/grinning phase of their relationship.
Like: Although Hank can't get his act together in most of his life, he does seem to have it together for his daughter; his scenes with Becca always seems to come across as refreshing compared with his interaction with the rest of the world. There's been a little of the "child raising the parents" theme, but not much.
And even though I find Hank's sex life unrealistic, it does allow for several entertaining scenes and lots of fun lines -- I imagine that's how the creators originally pitched the show. My favorite Hank line from last night: "I love all women. I'll make a run for you too, crusty." This week's scenes between Charlie (Hank's agent/friend) and his wife also gave a few genuine laughs ("Maybe we should have a safe word."/"Okay, the safe word is DON'T PEE ON ME.")
Overall, Californication, like its characters, is flawed but entertaining.
I can't quite say the same for Weeds, which appears as flawless as ever in its plot -- everything happening this year seems to be a natural escalation of events from the first two seasons -- but yet seems less entertaining than usual. Perhaps it's to be expected; things are serious this year. Still, Nancy's scenes with U-Turn seemed just shy of enjoyable; all the potentially comedic elements of U-Turn's burly gangsta trying to train Nancy in the ways of thugdom were overshadowed by the constant threat of him causing her serious physical harm. Realistic, yes (as far as this show goes, anyway). But less fun. Also, Doug, Heylia, Celia, Andy and Conrad are all underused so far this year. Even Matthew Modine's new character seems full of potential, but lacking in meat. And this is a show that knows how to give its side characters meat.
Sunday, September 2, 2007
Inside: We saw SUPERBAD
But then again, I usually can't separate a genius comedy from a merely entertaining one until I've seen it at least a couple of times. You can watch those genius comedies--40YOV, Office Space, Harold and Kumar, Airplane! are a few of mine--over and over again without getting tired of them. In fact, they seem even funnier each time you see them. On first viewing, you inevitably miss some of the comedic elements that are more subtle (and far more rewarding) while you're laughing at the more obvious ones.
I have a feeling that Superbad in particular will grow on me with repeat viewings. For example is Seth, played by Jonah Hill, seems overly abrasive (i.e., more bitter than funny) at the beginning of the movie. When I see it again, he'll likely seem funnier from the get-go, since I've now seen the whole movie and know where that abrasiveness is coming from and where it's going. There are also a few slow parts that I imagine will seem funnier the second or third time around.
Like: I loved the penis drawings. As someone who inherited a number of textbooks with penis art in them, this bit rang completely true and hilarious. The number, variety and...skill of the drawings alone is soda-through-the-nose worthy. Also, Christopher Mintz-Plasse was wonderful as Fogell/McLovin. The blood on the leg bit has the distinct honor of being totally gross and quite original (not an easy accomplishment in the world of toilet humor). And the ending was pitch-perfect.
Dislike: Okay, we all love movie geeks and we all root for them to get the girl in the end. But it would be so much more believable (and enjoyable) if they didn't end up with the hottest girls in school. Actually, Evan's crush Becca's comes across as more cute than hot, but the disparity between Seth and Jules is pretty damn big. I'm not saying that they should have cast exact visual counterparts for Seth and Evan, but it would have been delightful if at least one of the girl characters was just a little more geeky herself. Alright, I know the movie is by guys for guys, but c'mon, throw the girl viewers a bone here. We cannot live on penis drawings alone.